(no subject)
Jul. 12th, 2025 06:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. 58 books read so far in 2025. My "Want to Read" bookshelf on Goodreads is now at 400+, but some of these are... aspirational. At least I can never complain that there's nothing left to read.
2. I finished The Caves of Steel by Isaac Asimov. It's dated in a way that I now find interesting--part of the charm of old school sf is that the future it imagines looks like the past. At one point one character gives a lengthy explanation of how spacers have naive immune systems and would be killed by regular non-fatal Earth diseases, and I realized Asimov decided to include this because it was not common knowledge in 1953. The book espouses some very Malthusian ideas and concludes that the solution to overpopulation is to send more people to space. Also spotted: incredibly dated gender politics, positronic brains, the three laws of robotics (Asimov invented the term robotics; robot was coined by another sf author), and 60-mph moving walkways.
3. I was poking around the Wayback Machine copy of FanHistory.com and found a page on a 2009 sf drama I don't remember hearing about: The War on Science Fiction. Some misogynistic blog claimed that girls were ruining sf, and then a bunch of other sf blogs dunked on them. John Scalzi's response.
It reminded me that I'd recently listened to the audiobook of Women Destroy Science Fiction! (2014)--a short-story anthology by various female authors. With a title like that, I assumed there was a backstory, but I didn't know if it was inspired by a particular incident or just a general trend of sf fanboy whining. I just googled it and found the explanation: a deluge of sexist commentary in 2013. I wonder if they're referring to the first iteration of the sad puppies?
2. I finished The Caves of Steel by Isaac Asimov. It's dated in a way that I now find interesting--part of the charm of old school sf is that the future it imagines looks like the past. At one point one character gives a lengthy explanation of how spacers have naive immune systems and would be killed by regular non-fatal Earth diseases, and I realized Asimov decided to include this because it was not common knowledge in 1953. The book espouses some very Malthusian ideas and concludes that the solution to overpopulation is to send more people to space. Also spotted: incredibly dated gender politics, positronic brains, the three laws of robotics (Asimov invented the term robotics; robot was coined by another sf author), and 60-mph moving walkways.
3. I was poking around the Wayback Machine copy of FanHistory.com and found a page on a 2009 sf drama I don't remember hearing about: The War on Science Fiction. Some misogynistic blog claimed that girls were ruining sf, and then a bunch of other sf blogs dunked on them. John Scalzi's response.
It reminded me that I'd recently listened to the audiobook of Women Destroy Science Fiction! (2014)--a short-story anthology by various female authors. With a title like that, I assumed there was a backstory, but I didn't know if it was inspired by a particular incident or just a general trend of sf fanboy whining. I just googled it and found the explanation: a deluge of sexist commentary in 2013. I wonder if they're referring to the first iteration of the sad puppies?